4 ms·
Another great example of innovation (mostly) free from copyright: music. Modern production techniques, especially in hip-hop and electronic music, often involve
by ssalka 3y ago
Another great example of innovation (mostly) free from copyright: music. Modern production techniques, especially in hip-hop and electronic music, often involve "sampling" other works, ranging from highly de-contextualized clips (eg vocal manipulation, scratching etc) up to straight ripping entire sections from other songs (eg Eminem's "Sing for the Moment", which samples Aerosmith's "Dream On", both for the instrumental beat and the chorus).
That last example may have actually been the result of going through the proper channels to get approval, since it's big artists on either side of it, but generally it's such common practice to sample others' work when making music that suing for copyright claims is extremely rare compared to the prevalence of possibly infringing cases.
Sampling to me, and other practices like it, are basically vehicles for creativity and innovation, and it's quite clear that copyright law really only serves to limit this innovation by attempting to restrict usage of creative works. I think Wax Tailor's "Once Upon a Past"[1] sums it up best:
> Where a cultural production - at least musically - was full of possibilities, by virtue of being able to freely appropriate from the musical past to make new combinations, and thus new meanings, the story demonstrates that a society "free to borrow and built upon the past" is culturally richer than a controlled one
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYh82fl75oU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYh82fl75oU
- leviathant 3y ago> generally it's such common practice to sample others' work when making music that suing for copyright claims is extremely rare compared to the prevalence of possibly infringing cases. While it's true that there's all kinds of music made by sampling other music, when a sample-heavy song starts to gain commercial momentum, copyright comes into harsh focus real fast - sometimes it's lawsuits, but more often there are licensing conversations had in order to avoid those lawsuits. Is it applied evenly? Definitely not, and this is the topic of a thousand longform blogs and multiple documentaries and articles and so on. For example - you may think that because you've never heard about EMI suing Danger Mouse over the Grey Album, that this was "innovation mostly free from copyright ... especially in hip-hop" - but just because nothing went to court doesn't mean there weren't a lot of conversations between lawyers, and agreements made around what exactly happened there.