8 ms·
If it's atmospheric capture or un-gamed diversion of emissions, I think it's a win. If it's carbon offsets tied to an existent forest or whatever, I agree with
by version_five 3y ago
If it's atmospheric capture or un-gamed diversion of emissions, I think it's a win. If it's carbon offsets tied to an existent forest or whatever, I agree with you.
- bertil 3y agoThose seem to be mostly serious approaches, i.e. no offset on historical forests, but they include some approaches that are not as obvious as direct air capture.