3 ms·
> it is going to do so, by no fault of the government itself, in a very inefficient way Whose fault is it then? I mean if we agree that some governments/organ
by qwytw 3y ago
> it is going to do so, by no fault of the government itself, in a very inefficient way
Whose fault is it then? I mean if we agree that some governments/organizations are more efficient than others who else could we blame?
>UBI replacing many systems
For instance the British government spends about £2500 per capita on welfare. Even if admin etc. would cost nothing £200 per month is not exactly an amount which would allow you to not work, meaning people who can't actually work would starve/freeze/etc. to death without any additional support from the government or somebody else.
- gchamonlive 3y agoIt is nobody's fault, it is intrinsically difficult to organize a large group of humans. Some countries deal with it better, many examples come to mind from Europe, but they have many advantages and still are far from being efficient in general. Look I am not a political philosopher, not even close. But I can refer you to Robert Nozick's the Minimal Estate. I am not sure I agree with everything he says there, but I think he describes interesting points regarding govnmt efficiency.