3 ms·
> driven by consumer desire for local LLMs Citation needed. I don't think general public has any desire/care for that. Like they don't care about a locally run
by emilsedgh 3y ago
> driven by consumer desire for local LLMs
Citation needed. I don't think general public has any desire/care for that. Like they don't care about a locally run Siri.
- bobbylarrybobby 3y agoIndividuals may not, but businesses absolutely care that their data isn't accessible to third parties
- rcme 3y agoReally? Most businesses don’t seem to have any trouble uploading data to AWS.
- viraptor 3y agoThere's a massive difference between companies providing you services where they interact with your data only and AWS which provides you infrastructure and doesn't care much what you do with it. There's not a single case I'm aware of where someone complained about Amazon accessing their private data in AWS and using it in any way.
- rcme 3y agoWalmart refuses to use AWS, for what it is worth. And no, I don't think there is a functional difference between what AWS does and what is described above.
- viraptor 3y agoThat makes sense for Walmart. They don't want to sponsor the competition and the risk of leaking secrets may be unacceptable, even if you trust AWS operations to behave properly. I think Walmart is a complete outlier in this topic and they wouldn't use AWS even if homomorphic encryption was realistically usable for all their software. On the other hand, Netflix did (does?) use AWS.
- 8n4vidtmkvmk 3y agoI would love a local Google Home. The response time is abysmal and the results are often poor. I should at least be able to control my home lights without internet.
- senttoschool 3y agoI think local LLMs, if available and equivalent to GPT4, it will most certainly be preferred over ChatGPT.