3 ms·
This is such a poor interpretation of the data that it almost seems intentional. They're cherry-picking an arbitrary year for comparison over an arbitrary time
by semicolon_storm 3y ago
This is such a poor interpretation of the data that it almost seems intentional.
They're cherry-picking an arbitrary year for comparison over an arbitrary time range. There's many years you can select to draw similar bad comparisons. For example, select 2021 & 2015 and look at Feb 28 - March 5. Are you going to believe a sensationalist claim that "90% of SST rise between 2021 & 2015 arrived in 2 weeks"?
Hopefully not, because that's a bad comparison and ignores that temperature fluctuates up and down
- comicjk 3y agoThis is a classic math pitfall, described by mathematician Jordan Ellenberg as "Don’t talk about percentages of numbers when the numbers might be negative" because they're more often confusing than illuminating. https://slate.com/human-interest/2014/06/how-not-to-be-wrong-how-to-lie-with-negative-numbers.html https://slate.com/human-interest/2014/06/how-not-to-be-wrong...