>Unsurprisingly of course while it said this is not a proven treatment, it did not have the reasoning skills to suggest that, hey that might be dangerous and is

>Unsurprisingly of course while it said this is not a proven treatment, it did not have the reasoning skills to suggest that, hey that might be dangerous and is an unsafe thing to do, etc. TBF I wonder how many people on the street would also include that warning. Ask the questions that ChatGPT gets to any random person on the street, disallow them to say "I don't know", and force them to come up with an answer and you'd likely get more bullshit than ChatGPT since that person simply has a lot less knowledge in their head. A recurring weakness of LLM criticisms are unwarranted expectations and comparisons to normal, functioning adults and even professionals. We don't really have a good rubric for "thing that has a lot of shallow knowledge and text-based skills" because that's basically useless in society, although getting to that point was a scientific achievement. None of this makes it a good product though.