4 ms·
The painting that the woman left behind seems to be what has attracted people to this case. I look at paintings on a daily basis, and am very used to 'reading'
by Daub 3y ago
The painting that the woman left behind seems to be what has attracted people to this case.
I look at paintings on a daily basis, and am very used to 'reading' them. Here I what I get from it...
- The artist did not go to art school, or receive any other formal training.
- I belive that it was painted by a woman.
- Most of the figures in the painting seem to be women.
- The two figures on the left were painted using photographs as reference, probably the same photograph.
- The painting has a strong african feel to it, and its colors feel a bit Ugandan.
- The left/right chaos/structure construction of the painting is very strong. Many paintings feature such structure, but rarely as overt as this. This is a feature of paintings by people who have not received much in the way of a formal traing.
- I believe that this painting was made by a woman as a response to a crisis, probably of sexual/social origin.
- I belive it is also a self portrait.
Edit... I should say that I am using as reference the BBC's photo of the painting, as reffernced by user rwmj.
- ealexhudson 3y agoThe jewelry looked hand-made to me; it's chunky for what it is and quite rustic. Suggests the person is in/around some kind of craft art scene in general, but not necessarily an artist or professionally involved. Vaguely amazing to me that in 2004 it would be possible to have a building that tall with windows that open fully in a public area that someone could jump out of. That strikes me as unusual, it's amazing they weren't able to figure out her connection to the building back then.
- jl6 3y agoAlso surprising is the dearth of contemporary news articles about this incident. I can't find anything in any major news paper from 2004.