4 ms·
They're "artificial neural networks" and it would seem to me it's recognizing stop signs by comparing them to images of stop signs. So I tend to lean toward "AI
by oblib 3y ago
They're "artificial neural networks" and it would seem to me it's recognizing stop signs by comparing them to images of stop signs. So I tend to lean toward "AI" is the latest "buzzword". I think in truth it's more akin to a search engine reacting to inputs, but from sensor data, than anything close to real "intelligence" of any kind.
I can see how it appears to intelligent, but it lacks reasoning, creativity, and critical thinking.
- zeknife 3y agoIf I had a fully functional self-driving car, I wouldn't be lamenting that it wasn't creative enough
- MereInterest 3y ago“Creative” doesn’t necessarily mean “generating new behavior”, but can also mean “generating new hypotheses”. Suppose you see a group of young kids playing in a yard. One tosses a ball up into the air, and the rest run towards it. The first to reach the ball throws it back into the air, and the rest run toward it again. It requires creativity to recognize the rules of the game as “try to be the first to reach the ball”, to recognize that the thrower may not have time to carefully aim, and that the others might chase the ball regardless of its location. Only if all three of those creative leaps are made, then logical deduction can take over to conclude “if the ball goes in front of me, stop before a kid does the same”.