5 ms·
Except of course, it's not negative to the tune of $21B. Any more than California diverting half its rainwater to the ocean was either environmentally or econo
by abernard1 3y ago
Except of course, it's not negative to the tune of $21B. Any more than California diverting half its rainwater to the ocean was either environmentally or economically useful to its ecosystem.
This is the same state where a good 70% of the population was under the delusion its state government could competently produce a train from North to South _and_ that they actually wanted to do so for altruistic reasons unrelated to buying off that critical missing piece of the legislature for supermajority budget power.
This is the same state whose very non-unique ecosystem plagues it with wildfires because they have no forest management.
The same state whose governor and highest ranking elected officials graduated from a city that can't figure out how to keep homeless people from dying on the street in droves.
California, and especially its "expert" class, is a political construction. It's amazing that after 50 years of chronic failure and a tax base solely built around capital gains and rent extraction from their two-tiered feudal economic sector that anyone trusts anything that comes out of California. It's delusional. If people's status wasn't so tied into this dream and idea of California progress, everyone could see it for what it truly is.
- toomuchtodo 3y ago> Except of course, it's not negative to the tune of $21B. Please prove this assertion with citations. The rest of your comment has no relevance to the topic at hand.
- abernard1 3y ago> The rest of your comment has no relevance to the topic at hand. My comment, much like credibility of "expert" testimony in a trial, has to do with large scale failures of so-called expert governance in California. I'm sure all of the embarrassing failures I mentioned had plenty of citations, just as I'm sure that the decrepit weirdly-fancy-for-a-third-world-banana-republic of San Francisco had reams of highly-remunerated research around their policy innovations on homelessness. Problems which in other far more boring cities were, if not solved problems, managed well due to common sense.