3 ms·
Even if we believe the lack of agenda of openAI there is no way to ever certify chatGPT doesn’t have its own (stochastic) agenda
by jerpint 3y ago
Even if we believe the lack of agenda of openAI there is no way to ever certify chatGPT doesn’t have its own (stochastic) agenda
- IIAOPSW 3y agoIs randomness an agenda? I'm reminded of the time I ordered nothing at a restaurant and the bought back an empty plate.
- rexpop 3y agoThis koan[0] gets posted in a Hacker News comment once a year-or-so for the past sixteen, but apparently there are still those about who've not yet encountered it? When it comes to neural networks' preconceptions--my gosh, especially those of neural nets!--there is no such thing as an empty plate. 0. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16000 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16000
- treeman79 3y agoAsk it to tell a joke about different religions. Some are off limits. Some are fair game. Basically whomever the developers don’t like.s
- Zetobal 3y agoRead the OP again the model itself doesn't have limits. OpenAI implemtened them as safeguards.
- anankaie 3y agoIf it was truly random, it would not generate useful outputs. You can think of it similar to randomly sampling one of the authors' (of the training data) observed ideological lean. One way to model and measure this would be to think of the different possible ideological leans as being in a superposition that you sample from when generating the output. In that sense, you can think of the expectation value of the lean (depending on the specific circumstances of your measurement, i.e. the prefix on input) along with the entropy as the information you can use to describe the gestalt. In a sense this is the same judgement you would make as saying that $SocialNetwork has a "position".