3 ms·
“Losses caused by striking” is a funny way to describe the holding of the case, which was about cement truck drivers deliberately timing their strike to maximiz
by twoodfin 3y ago
“Losses caused by striking” is a funny way to describe the holding of the case, which was about cement truck drivers deliberately timing their strike to maximize the risk of damage to the trucks and at a minimum spoil their loads.
The decision was 8-1.
- hgsgm 3y agoOr management deliberately times the cement mixing to block the strike. Everyone seems to miss that the Court did not rule on the merits of the case. They rules on a procedural question. They ruled that the suit can go forward because intentional damage was within the realm of possibility. Jackson dissented because she believed that NLRB has priority jurisdiction before other lawsuit venues. No one on HN knows who is "right".