3 ms·
Fair, let me try gpt4 with your original prompt and see what I get. The book you're thinking of is "Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and The F
by Spivak 3y ago
Fair, let me try gpt4 with your original prompt and see what I get.
The book you're thinking of is "Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and
The Forgotten History" by Dr. Suzanne Humphries and Roman Bystrianyk. The book
discusses the history of vaccines, including smallpox, and challenges the popular
belief that vaccines were solely responsible for their eradication.
The gpt4 api gives zero fucks. It really does seem like it's just whatever logic they layered on to ChatGPT.
- mike_hearn 3y agoYou're right, I can also reproduce that behavior with the API. Fascinating. I really thought they were the same model but ChatGPT4 is clearly a lot more RLHFd compared to the API. Not only is the API honest but it's also way less wordy. Practically every answer from ChatGPT in the sample conversation had to be truncated because it includes an essay about the scientific consensus.
- lucubratory 3y agoThe API model is just as RLHF'd as they disclosed in their 'paper'. The difference you're seeing is very likely to just be the ChatGPT pre-prompt telling it not to engage in harmful activities.