I think there's at least two pieces here 1. Concern about loss off creativity in creative exercises: this is a fair UX critique. Personally, I find that using

I think there's at least two pieces here 1. Concern about loss off creativity in creative exercises: this is a fair UX critique. Personally, I find that using ChatGPT as a rubber duck is extremely valuable, even for complex "softskill" challenges. I wish more tools were built towards this angle, instead of trying to just do the work with AI. I imagine an LLM auto-writing text like now, with subsequent UX highlighting points to converse and evolve the artifact. 2. Post-scarcity loss of meaning where quality used to be a proxy metric. eg if a professor of status took the time to write a good letter of recommendation, you were really worth it. This was always a flawed and biased system. Same for yearly reviews, and most promo processes. Hopefully society adapts by dropping the fluff in favor of hard data - a bulletpoint list from a professor with some mechanism to verify the number of recommendations made seems better than what we have today.