5 ms·
Network effects explain this just fine, it's not an indicator against the point of the article.
by friend_and_foe 3y ago
Network effects explain this just fine, it's not an indicator against the point of the article.
- morelisp 3y agoNetwork effects for distributed VC are quite weak, it's one of the reasons git was able to displace alternatives relatively quietly, and why mercurial is able to soldier on despite git's visible dominance.
- jonnycomputer 3y agodidn't save svn
- BryanLegend 3y agoSVN is doing just fine
- jonnycomputer 3y agoI'm sure it is. For the few people who use it. Once upon a time, it was the dominant versioning system out there. But it was supplanted by git. And it was supplanted for a reason. And network effects didn't protect it from being replaced by git. What is your point exactly?
- Nextgrid 3y agoIt's unfair to consider network effects when it comes to SVN because it was a very different time on the internet with no major centralized code hosting SaaS like GitHub. Nowadays even companies (that would in the past self-host) rely on SaaS and are thus swayed by network effects of whatever is popular.
- thunderbong 3y agoIt was not supplanted by git, but by Github
- jonnycomputer 3y agoThat's objectively false.
- MikusR 3y agoI am going to write a Myspace post submit the link to Digg and ask people on Windows Live Messenger to upvote.