> They had assurances that they wouldn't just have it ripped from them, are being given time to find a replacement Sure, but we're still talking after the even

> They had assurances that they wouldn't just have it ripped from them, are being given time to find a replacement Sure, but we're still talking after the event here. The overall point of being over-reliant on a single donor in the first place remains the fundamental problem that could have been avoided. I suggest we draw a line in the sand and agree to disagree.