3 ms·
They had assurances that they wouldn't just have it ripped from them, are being given time to find a replacement, and are engaging multiple avenues to do so. Th
by tedivm 3y ago
They had assurances that they wouldn't just have it ripped from them, are being given time to find a replacement, and are engaging multiple avenues to do so. They are having absolutely no downtime from this process. You're making assumptions that aren't warranted at all to make a point that really just seems like an excuse for you to be angry at random strangers. I'm honestly not sure why you are so upset (and rude) about this.
- traceroute66 3y ago> They had assurances that they wouldn't just have it ripped from them, are being given time to find a replacement Sure, but we're still talking after the event here. The overall point of being over-reliant on a single donor in the first place remains the fundamental problem that could have been avoided. I suggest we draw a line in the sand and agree to disagree.