5 ms·
I read the whole comment. The implication was that it wasn't really disabled because at some point it was enabled.
by tssva 3y ago
I read the whole comment. The implication was that it wasn't really disabled because at some point it was enabled.
- remram 3y agoWhat makes you think that? The explicit, not-implied argument is that it enabled because it "is impossible to boot a modern Intel x86 system without it". Of course if you ignore arguments entirely, other people's opinions become arbitrary. But that's all you.