I guess users would still be able to install common desktop and productivity applications via flatpak or snap. Is there much value to using rpms for this at thi

I guess users would still be able to install common desktop and productivity applications via flatpak or snap. Is there much value to using rpms for this at this point? I know it's a sensitive topic to some people who just don't like any change unless its on their terms. But I think the reality is that with so many linux distributions around the job of packaging up software for those is a rather tedious and thankless one. Or in the case of IBM/Red Hat also one without a lot of revenue/profit opportunities. So, I can see why IBM would want to reduce the number of packages they have to worry about.