From the article > Now, it's decided to take the easy way out by giving people like Donald Trump and his enablers free rein to continue to lie without consequen

From the article > Now, it's decided to take the easy way out by giving people like Donald Trump and his enablers free rein to continue to lie without consequence I don't understand this argument. How is youtube censoring a consequence? Why would someone think youtube should be responsible for handing out consequences anyway? And why wouldn’t there be consequences? I do think most people agree that various forms of bad faith speech should be discourage have consequences