> The use of common sense does not preclude the use of evidence. In fact, when good evidence is available, it suggests it. Nothing I said implies the opposite.

> The use of common sense does not preclude the use of evidence. In fact, when good evidence is available, it suggests it. Nothing I said implies the opposite. > You are arguing a distinction that does not exist. No, the paper framed the issue as if such distinction exists. I didn’t agree with that and I don’t see why you would accuse me of that.