4 ms·
Did you miss the whole part about the boot process? It was the second sentence. You could only think they said that "just because" it you only read the first se
by remram 3y ago
Did you miss the whole part about the boot process? It was the second sentence. You could only think they said that "just because" it you only read the first sentence of their comment.
- tssva 3y agoI read the whole comment. The implication was that it wasn't really disabled because at some point it was enabled.
- remram 3y agoWhat makes you think that? The explicit, not-implied argument is that it enabled because it "is impossible to boot a modern Intel x86 system without it". Of course if you ignore arguments entirely, other people's opinions become arbitrary. But that's all you.