3 ms·
I can't tell what point you're trying to make and yet it seems wrong.
by remram 3y ago
I can't tell what point you're trying to make and yet it seems wrong.
- tssva 3y agoThe point is that just because something is enabled at some point doesn't mean it can't be disabled at a later point. The original poster didn't seem to think ME is really disabled just because at some point it was enabled.
- remram 3y agoDid you miss the whole part about the boot process? It was the second sentence. You could only think they said that "just because" it you only read the first sentence of their comment.
- tssva 3y agoI read the whole comment. The implication was that it wasn't really disabled because at some point it was enabled.
- remram 3y agoWhat makes you think that? The explicit, not-implied argument is that it enabled because it "is impossible to boot a modern Intel x86 system without it". Of course if you ignore arguments entirely, other people's opinions become arbitrary. But that's all you.