3 ms·
Wow thanks everyone for the replies! I hear you on homes but housing overall - apartments included should not be owned by corporations for investment purposes
by Brainfood 3y ago
Wow thanks everyone for the replies!
I hear you on homes but housing overall - apartments included should not be owned by corporations for investment purposes imho.
Rough stats I’ve seen are 25% of homes are now owned by institutional investors. And 44% of CA residents are renters. Having a quarter of the inventory taken off the market means the prices are going to go up.
Land is expensive. We can build more. We can also stop allowing those who have more than enough already continue to apply downward pressure.
- _jab 3y agoI'd been of the impression that corporate home ownership is mostly surging in places like the South and Sun Belt, where housing prices themselves are surging. Housing prices in California have been pretty stagnant since Covid, at least compared to much of the rest of the country. California real estate isn't actually a great investment for these companies right now.
- rcpt 3y agoRight. Price to rent ratios in California means that when you buy the only thing you get is a bet on real estate. New landlords are cash flow negative by wide margins. Wild speculation with no fundamentals isn't attractive to big firms.
- philwelch 3y ago> I hear you on homes but housing overall - apartments included should not be owned by corporations for investment purposes imho. A single apartment building (or complex) might have around a hundred tenants and a handful of employees. That's a large enough operation that it's straight up irresponsible not to set up an LLC or corporation for it.