> if it could be shown to be a clear cut case of being accidental why wouldn’t people in a position to do so, show that? How would that even look like? The co

> if it could be shown to be a clear cut case of being accidental why wouldn’t people in a position to do so, show that? How would that even look like? The conclusion that it is most likely an accidental fire was not reached by finding something in particular, but by not finding evidence indicating a criminal motive. > It raises some questions doesn’t it? You are are certainly raising a lot of questions. If you think something why don't you spell it out? > Why aren’t they safe guarding and defending the nation’s culture and heritage? Why are they leaving it open and vulnerable to attack? Why are you talking about an attack? Who attacked the church in your opinion and how? What in particular would you like to be done by whom?