> At least in san francisco it seems its people who lived in SF before becoming homeless that are in the majority. This is bog-standard mis-reporting of statis

> At least in san francisco it seems its people who lived in SF before becoming homeless that are in the majority. This is bog-standard mis-reporting of statistics, and I would encourage you to download and read the original homeless census report. A person who had home in SF for 1 month and then lived unhoused in SF for 10 years is counted among those "long term" SF residents who became homeless. They're not really from SF, even if they technically become homeless while living in SF.