3 ms·
No, because definitionally the money was better spent by the rich people. Note: I am not saying that this is the case, but the constructed scenario already supp
by endisneigh 3y ago
No, because definitionally the money was better spent by the rich people. Note: I am not saying that this is the case, but the constructed scenario already supposes that.
- spywaregorilla 3y ago"Better" as in better for social good? If that's what you're arguing your constructed scenario is just dumb.
- endisneigh 3y agoBetter as in like how the population would want the money spent.
- spywaregorilla 3y agoseems like a pointlessly unrealistic premise