> Those "very few" people very prominently include Yudkowski himself, or so I understand. I don't think that's true; he's stated before he doesn't and didn't b

> Those "very few" people very prominently include Yudkowski himself, or so I understand. I don't think that's true; he's stated before he doesn't and didn't believe it was true. His reaction was more about the stupidity of posting information hazards on public fora rather than that specific information hazard being credible. However, he could be lying post-facto. And I do agree that it kind of sucks that Yud is the "face of AI risk" because it doesn't even matter how correct he might be; a lot of people just don't like him (I'm indifferent). There shouldn't be a "Face of AI risk" because there won't be a single person that everyone like. The idea is bigger than him.