2 ms·
It's not really an equivalence, if you remove the sensationalism, it's just a point that the free work is already being provided. Put more succinctly I'm makin
by Me1000 3y ago
It's not really an equivalence, if you remove the sensationalism, it's just a point that the free work is already being provided.
Put more succinctly I'm making two points:
1) The free work is already being done.
2) StackOverflow has been crawl-able since forever.
You'd have to address both of those problems before the concern that you're raising becomes relevant. Banning the posting of new generated content doesn't address either of those things.
- nologic01 3y agoOk, it makes more sense now. But you need to consider the significant incremental benefit to the model training process when creating labels exactly where the model underperforms. The baseline you mention is already an issue that is being debated hotly. My comment was that humans reviewing and fixing new AI content is exactly not what should be done in the current circumstances.