3 ms·
> First, this is a five-year-old article. And a dupe. I believe this is why the title is "...5 years later and you're still doing it wrong". It's probably wort
by jsight 15y ago
> First, this is a five-year-old article. And a dupe.
I believe this is why the title is "...5 years later and you're still doing it wrong". It's probably worth discussing why things haven't really changed in the past 5 years regarding this.
- mcknz 15y agoThe article is dated 2006. I doubt there are many relevant lessons to take away from a discussion of Agile circa 2002-2006. edit: relevant for historical reasons, but less so for 2012, which is what I thought when I read it. [2006] on the title would be helpful.
- softbuilder 15y agoThe title was confusing. I thought it was a new article, looking back over 5 years, not a 5 year old article.
- Blunt 15y agooh no it's not worth discussing. The discussion is pointless including Yegge's diatribe. Great software is written by great software engineers. (period) end of story. And there is no amount of management that can be thrown in that can make sucky programmers better at their job.