And it seems like the judge agrees with you. Nonetheless adverse possession is a real legal principle that has been applied in situations like this (though may

And it seems like the judge agrees with you. Nonetheless adverse possession is a real legal principle that has been applied in situations like this (though maybe not against the federal government? I'm not the expert). It's not like this was a gonzo or weird argument. There really does seem to have been a standard convention in place that treats these checkerboard tracts as unitary properties.