Before jumping to conclusions, be sure to check out this context: https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389582/what-is-the-network-policy-regarding-ai-gener

Before jumping to conclusions, be sure to check out this context: https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389582/what-is-the-network-policy-regarding-ai-generated-content https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389582/what-is-the-... TL; DR - the policy is “we can’t tell if something is AI generated, so hard to justify removal on just that basis.” > We recently performed a set of analyses on the current approach to AI-generated content moderation. The conclusions of these analyses strongly indicate to us that AI-generated content is not being properly identified across the network, and that the potential for false-positives is very high. Through no fault of moderators' own, we also suspect that there have been biases for or against residents of specific countries as a potential result of the heuristics being applied to these posts. Finally, internal evidence strongly suggests that the overapplication of suspensions for AI-generated content may be turning away a large number of legitimate contributors to the site.