4 ms·
The case is from 2021 (ruling Jan 2022) meaning her rejection of treatment had to be prior to that. She had to have TB even before that. It’s fair to assume sh
by lettergram 3y ago
The case is from 2021 (ruling Jan 2022) meaning her rejection of treatment had to be prior to that. She had to have TB even before that. It’s fair to assume she got it mid-2021 or earlier
- anoonmoose 3y agook so now that the minor disagreement about dates has been resolved, how about the major disagreement over evidence her disease is not latent?