> Why should drivers be video streaming? Because nobody has drawn a red line and Ron Jones in 1967 has shown us how vulnerable our freedom is. We already has

> Why should drivers be video streaming? Because nobody has drawn a red line and Ron Jones in 1967 has shown us how vulnerable our freedom is. We already has a lot of mandatory non-FOSS software in cars which use to phone home which effectively is a streaming (not a video yet, but amount of data is never decreasing). And a lot of so-called safety (surveillance in reality) devices are around us nowadays - phones exposing a lot of uncertain data about us, bank cards which allows banks know where we are right now, etc. If some crackpot politician proves to safety-demanding influencers that video streaming from every moving car helps us to prevent $bad_things_list so that kind of demand is totally possible, especially if using cars for mass killings would become more common than mass shootings. > I'm just suggesting that regulators should compare accident rates of cars with and without automated breaking. It's impossible because you have not 100% of the data.