3 ms·
Seems to be vying for the same compile-to-C niche as Nim, though Lisp homoiconicity is welcome. I must say though, from the summary, I'm not a fan of using C ty
by netbioserror 3y ago
Seems to be vying for the same compile-to-C niche as Nim, though Lisp homoiconicity is welcome. I must say though, from the summary, I'm not a fan of using C type keywords. I much prefer the adoption of something unambiguous e.g. Rust or D. Nim prefers 64-bit numeric types but has compatible subtypes with bit widths in them (int32, float32).