4 ms·
The third part sounds like compelled speech which isn't constitutional.
by narrator 3y ago
The third part sounds like compelled speech which isn't constitutional.
- KerrAvon 3y agoIANAL, but it sounds like they're allowed to avoid linking to things, just not punitively. You'd have to sue them to find out whether it's punitive, but that's what discovery is for.
- asveikau 3y agoI like how everybody's suddenly a constitutional expert here. I'm skimming legislature.ca.gov, I can't seem to find the definition of "covered platform", but speaking charitably, I'm guessing they basically narrowly defined a social media recommendation algorithm and are trying to regulate what it can do. Saying an algorithm can't penalize on X criteria doesn't seem like compelled speech to me.