4 ms·
Canada also already has pretty strict internal content regulations https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_content https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_co
by neom 3y ago
Canada also already has pretty strict internal content regulations
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_content https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_content
It's part of the reason why so many artists come out of Canada. Inorder to satisfy the content regulations the government heavily subsidized the arts.
- 908B64B197 3y agoThe most interesting thing is what's defined as "Canadian Content". Most of what Celine Dion produced in her career doesn't fit the government approved list of cultural content, so is considered foreign music. Celine Dion, probably Canada's most recognizable voice and signer, signing in French, a language almost exclusively spoken in Canada on the North American continent, isn't considered Canadian culture. But some recordings from Elvis do count because he happened to record them on Canadian soil. [0] [0] https://nationalpost.com/news/extremely-canadian-media-that-ottawa-doesnt-consider-cancon https://nationalpost.com/news/extremely-canadian-media-that-...
- neom 3y agoMakes sense, if you pick up and make a career for yourself using American resources you shouldn't be cancon, same with startups, can't get amazing startup Canadian capgains if you start Canadian and later basically become an American company. JB, Celine, Brian Adam's etc arguably started because Canada is such a hospitable environment to artists, if they pick up and basically come American... Why should we classify them as Canadian artists? Don't think any of them even live in Canada anymore, can't say I think they do much for the industry. Matt Dusk, CRJ, lightfoot etc keep it real.
- modzu 3y ago[flagged]
- gerbilly 3y ago> the only difference between a canadian and an american is a line on a map Kindly keep this kind of ignorant viewpoint to yourself. There are a lot of differences, and if you can't or won't see them that not our problem. As a Canadian, I don't want your two party political structure (soon to be one maybe?) and your supreme court of mostly old clerics making decisions based on their religious views in my country thanks. Or shall we talk about your daily mass shootings? If you guys think that is working for you, so much the better for you.
- CHB0403085482 3y agoNational medical insurance and maple syrup for all.
- modzu 3y ago..this comment saddens me. fyi i am not an american
- neom 3y ago[flagged]
- dang 3y agoPlease don't perpetuate nationalistic flamewars, or any flamewars, on HN, regardless of how bad another comment is or you feel it is. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- gerbilly 3y agoYou know @dang, I appreciate what you're trying to foster here, but despite that I think that some of the commenters on this site are keeping people away. My friend—who is much more restrained in speech than I am—and I were saying that we don't like to come to the 'orange site' as much as before, despite the sometimes excellent discussions, and though it's hard to say precisely why, the reason we came up with is the libertarian slant. You are doing a great job keeping the tone civil, but I think in the end it just leaves us with a community made up of say 33% of people politely saying impolite things. By controlling the tone, could it be that our trolls have just learned to deliver their absolutist, unfeeling and insensitive comments in polite language? We can detect tone but not intent, right? So we control the tone, but the trolls here (and no doubt about it we have them like anywhere else) have just learned to sealion people. And I stand by the provocative nature of the parent post. What if he/she had said 'The difference between a Russian and a Ukrainian is just a line on a map?' That is a politely stated idea. Would a Ukrainian have to take that with restraint too?