3 ms·
If the land it's being built on was previously thirsty farmland it may be a net positive in water usage
by tomatotomato37 3y ago
If the land it's being built on was previously thirsty farmland it may be a net positive in water usage
- RobotToaster 3y agoAs long as you don't need food.
- pfdietz 3y agoOne can import food from someplace with more water. It's the same way we don't subsidize farmers to grow bananas in Alaska, and then pretend that bananas would disappear if we stopped the subsidies.
- volkl48 3y agoThe US overproduces food to an absurd degree and isn't even remotely close to maximizing it's ability to grow it. Anyway, Ag shifted production to the Southwest because when you don't pay the actual value of the water, it's great - lots of sun, long growing season, basically free water = cheapest production. When water costs money....you'll see quite a bit of that production shift back up north.