> int is 32 bits with no sign bit or anything like other Lisp implementations do This seems potentially confusing, since usually "int" just refers to a signed

> int is 32 bits with no sign bit or anything like other Lisp implementations do This seems potentially confusing, since usually "int" just refers to a signed integer of some platform specific size. Maybe it would be better to say something like, "int is like uint32_t, 32 bits and no sign bit without any additional data"?