3 ms·
A year ago or so when China did a major crackdown on ed-tech and the private tutoring and education sector I read a lot of outraged stuff about it, but this kin
by Barrin92 3y ago
A year ago or so when China did a major crackdown on ed-tech and the private tutoring and education sector I read a lot of outraged stuff about it, but this kind of thing is the logical end result. A 17 year old writing a fake paper on chick-fil-A, 'peer-reviewed' by some non-existent degree mill to get a leg up on completely opaque college admissions.
Just make it simple. Stick with the SAT tests. There is nothing more equitable than standardized, rigorous testing. It will not be perfectly equitable because people do differ in their abilities, but they do differ less on that front than their parents wallets do. Which is of course why it's the more privileged households that love lobbying for these bogus qualifications instead of just doing merit based tests.
Just remember a simple fact, intellect is distributed on a Bell curve, money follows a power law distribution. Whenever you're concerned that merit based processes may have unequal results, anything that can be turned into pay-to-win is going to be worse.
- Ekaros 3y agoAnd if SAT is a bad test. Come up with better one. Just need to get enough schools to sing up for one at same time. Then just run same test in multiple locations at one time and allow using the results everywhere.
- dfadsadsf 3y ago> 'peer-reviewed' by some non-existent degree mill That's what poor people will do and it is easy to filter for degree mills. Upper middle class people will pay PhD students to add their kid name to decent papers as second author. Rich people will pay PhD post doc to put their kid as first or sole author. Billionaires will sponsor Nobel laureate lab and have kid as co-author on ground breaking paper that will get 1000+ citations in first year.