For what it's worth, I think you're misunderstanding the sentiment here. The argument isn't that a human is better at avoiding accidents than an automated syst

For what it's worth, I think you're misunderstanding the sentiment here. The argument isn't that a human is better at avoiding accidents than an automated system, the argument is that, as an average human, I'm good enough and the marginal difference isn't worth the complexity and risk that the system introduces.