2 ms·
In practice even parachutes are not so simple. If I'm a passenger in an airliner with no parachute, I definitely don't want my pilot bailing out. Also, insura
by HPsquared 3y ago
In practice even parachutes are not so simple.
If I'm a passenger in an airliner with no parachute, I definitely don't want my pilot bailing out.
Also, insurance rates on aircraft with airframe parachutes are higher than for aircraft without them - because pilots often panic and pull the chute, which guarantees a hard landing and totals the aircraft, rather than attempting a landing (with, say, a 90% success rate or whatever). The same might apply to individuals: jumping out of a plane is quite dangerous and it might be "statistically" safer to stay onboard and attempt a landing.
Pilots also may take more risks if they have parachutes, known as risk compensation. Like how people drive faster if the car feels safer. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk_compensation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk_compensation
- stonogo 3y ago> insurance rates on aircraft with airframe parachutes are higher than for aircraft without them Are we sure this isn't because aircraft iwth airframe parachutes are wildly expensive and/or heavily-customized vehicles? I'm not sure the correlation has been established as causative here.