4 ms·
So many misses in this paper — mistaking adjacencies for similarities, not defining culturally-referenced terms adequately. It is a perfect paper for accidenta
by svnt 3y ago
So many misses in this paper — mistaking adjacencies for similarities, not defining culturally-referenced terms adequately.
It is a perfect paper for accidentally exposing their own implicit biases and ontologies.
- emmender 3y agoThe value added by the paper is to direct the readers attention to BS - and make them think about it.