4 ms·
That's true. I was mainly trying to indicate there is no boxing or anything like some languages seem to have with their types.
by makuto 3y ago
That's true. I was mainly trying to indicate there is no boxing or anything like some languages seem to have with their types.
- Warwolt 3y ago> int is 32 bits with no sign bit or anything like other Lisp implementations do This seems potentially confusing, since usually "int" just refers to a signed integer of some platform specific size. Maybe it would be better to say something like, "int is like uint32_t, 32 bits and no sign bit without any additional data"?