> SQL is not a proper composable language, Very good point. Non-composable mean non-scalable (language). I wonder if it would be possible to define a very sm

> SQL is not a proper composable language, Very good point. Non-composable mean non-scalable (language). I wonder if it would be possible to define a very small robust standard subset of SQL with a standard for extending it. But that would take away the customer-lock-in which is what all big DB-vendors desire.