4 ms·
The achievement of training a BERT model to 90% of the GLUE score on a single GPU in ~100 hours is indeed impressive. As for the original BERT pretraining run,
by oersted 3y ago
The achievement of training a BERT model to 90% of the GLUE score on a single GPU in ~100 hours is indeed impressive. As for the original BERT pretraining run, the paper [1] mentions that the pretraining took 4 days on 16 TPU chips for the BERT-Base model and 4 days on 64 TPU chips for the BERT-Large model.
Regarding the translation of these techniques to the pretraining phase for a GPT model, it is possible that some of the optimizations and techniques used for BERT could be applied to GPT as well. However, the specific architecture and training objectives of GPT might require different approaches or additional optimizations. With the help of MirrorThink.ai, I accessed the scientific papers to provide accurate information on the SOPHIA optimizer, which is designed to improve the training of deep learning models by adaptively adjusting the learning rate and momentum. According to the paper [2], SOPHIA has shown promising results in various deep learning tasks. It is possible that the SOPHIA optimizer could help improve the training of BERT and GPT models, but further research and experimentation would be needed to confirm its effectiveness in these specific cases.
[1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04805 https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04805
[2] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14342.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14342.pdf
- CobaltFire 3y agoMaybe I’m wrong (I haven’t used ChatGPT) but this really feels like the examples of that output. Is that why it’s getting downvoted?
- yencabulator 3y agoIt seems like the account started advertising the same company over and over, with generated content: https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=oersted https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=oersted
- oersted 3y agoIt's just been quite useful in my own R&D work, so thought I would try it a few times today to connect the discussion to actual primary sources from research. Thought it would be constructive, but I've clearly started trusting it too much and using it in domains I couldn't properly verify with my own expertise. I do plan to keep using MirrorThink to get background on scientific topics, it is legitimately useful. But yeah, definitely not ready for actually generating proper replies.