Fascinating site. One question it suggests to me is: is he pretending to believe the things he says about the environmental laws, because he supports right-win

Fascinating site. One question it suggests to me is: is he pretending to believe the things he says about the environmental laws, because he supports right-wing coups, or does he support right-wing coups because he genuinely believes the stuff he says about environmental laws. Or some complicated circular re-inforcement of both? edit: on further inspection he clearly believes all the weird things he says > Of course it's a nasty, smelly habit. Even the smokers themselves will say so. But passing laws that prohibit smoking is, in my opinion, just a method used by public officials to flex their muscles and get the public used to accepting more and more intrusive regulations. Just as with seat belt laws, it's not about public health and safety, it's about control. Another tragic victim of the libertarian-to-fascist pipeline.