>and adding features to solve all of them will make the language much bigger, overall causing greater harm (even those who don't themselves use the feature need

>and adding features to solve all of them will make the language much bigger, overall causing greater harm (even those who don't themselves use the feature need to learn it to be able to read code). I agree that adding too many features can make a language too large and bloated. However, I disagree that this is always the case. For example, adding features that make it easier to code math is not necessarily a bad thing. In fact, it is a good thing, as it can make programming more accessible to a wider range of people. Additionally, math is often used in fields that require high speed, such as computer graphics and game development, Computer vision, Robotics, Machine learning, Natural language processing (NLP), Mathematical modeling, all kinds of scientific computing (Computational physics, Computational chemistry, Computational biology...) As a result, low-level programming languages are often used to implement the core code in these fields. As you see, Math is essential for many fields.