5 ms·
Rather than the raw number, what amazed me was the variety of language families that he was proficient with. Just like you might be less impressed with someone
by jballanc 15y ago
Rather than the raw number, what amazed me was the variety of language families that he was proficient with. Just like you might be less impressed with someone who can program in Java, C and C++ than someone who can program in C, Lisp, and Haskell, I know many people who can speak French, Italian, and Spanish...but does that even really count?
Here's the breakdown by my count:
* Spanish, French, Catalan, Italian -- pretty "core" Romance languages
* Dutch, Afrikaans, German, English -- closely related Germanic (even I, knowing English and a bit of German can understand some Dutch)
* Greek -- unique (and very impressive; I've been told by many multilingual individuals that Greek is unlike any other language and therefore a pain to learn)
* Russian -- shares a few characters with Greek, but that's it
* Hebrew -- a Semitic language, related to Arabic but distinct from the others he knows
About all he is missing is an agglutinative language (the "Lisp"s of human languages) such as Turkish, Korean, Finnish, or Japanese, or something tonal like Mandarin. Still, a very impressive accomplishment!
- ramblerman 15y agoThe Foreign Service Institute has a nice ranking of difficulty per language, for an english speaker http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Language_Learning_Difficulty_for_English_Speakers http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Language_Learning_Difficulty_fo...
- blacksmythe 15y ago>> speak French, Italian, and Spanish...but does that even really count? For an English speaker, French and Spanish probably should each count for about half of a language compared to learning a truly foreign language. Adding Italian to Spanish should count for less than a half (maybe a quarter?). However, trying to maintain Italian and Spanish simultaneously is very confusing due to the strong similarity.