> He continued to elaborate, saying, “We trained the system–‘Hey don’t kill the operator–that’s bad. You’re gonna lose points if you do that’. So what does it s

> He continued to elaborate, saying, “We trained the system–‘Hey don’t kill the operator–that’s bad. You’re gonna lose points if you do that’. So what does it start doing? It starts destroying the communication tower that the operator uses to communicate with the drone to stop it from killing the target.” Why aren't there hard limits: 'Protect our humans at all costs, protect our own assets, obey all laws of war.'? That seems like an obvious, fundamental consideration. Killing our own (and civilians) shouldn't be a matter of "points"; it shouldn't be done regardless of points. It's possible that the speaker just didn't express it well.