I agree with everything you said, I think I'm just trying to reconcile that with the top of thread saying python was the most correct because it was returning '

I agree with everything you said, I think I'm just trying to reconcile that with the top of thread saying python was the most correct because it was returning '7 code points' and that 'UTF-whatever is an implementation detail' But 7 is not the number of code points/USVs - that's the number of UTF-16 code units. The string is 5 USVs. If UTF-whatever is an implementation detail, wouldn't the correct answer to length be 5? What am I missing haha.